AT&T Reviews - Bandwidth

Listed below are the types of Bandwidth AT&T currently provides. AT&T Bandwidth is ranked by their avg. monthly cost, uptime, support and speed - then scored by averaging all user reviews for the given service.

AT&T provides:
  • Cable Internet,
  • DS3 Bandwidth,
  • DSL Internet,
  • OC192 Bandwidth and
  • OC48 Bandwidth
 Service.

Avg. Monthly Cost
Expensive
Service Uptime
Very Poor
Tech Support
Very Poor
T1 Speed
Very Poor
Overall Rating
Poor - 2 of 5 Stars
4
reviews
Hosted ServicesAvg. Monthly CostUptimeSupportSpeedAvg. Rating
AT&T Cable InternetWrite Review | Read Review  (1)
Avg. Monthly Cost: Average
Service Uptime: Very Poor
Tech Support: Very Poor
Cable Speed: Very Poor
Average Cable Rating: Poor - 2 of 5 Stars
AT&T DS3Write Review | Read Review  (1)
Avg. Monthly Cost: Very Expensive
Service Uptime: Very Poor
Tech Support: Very Poor
DS3 Speed: Very Poor
Average DS3 Rating: Very Poor - 1 of 5 Stars
AT&T DSLWrite Review | Read Reviews (2)
Avg. Monthly Cost: Expensive
Service Uptime: Poor
Tech Support: Very Poor
DSL Speed: Very Poor
Average DSL Rating: Poor - 2 of 5 Stars
AT&T OC192Write Review | Read Reviews  (0)
AT&T OC48Write Review | Read Reviews  (0)
User Preferred Hosted Service Providers

Companies Rated Higher than AT&T

CompanyAvg. Monthly CostServicesAvg. Rating
Visit Website | Read Review  (1)
SAVVIS's Avg. Monthly Cost: Very Expensive
SAVVIS's Average Rating: Outstanding - 5 of 5 Stars
Visit Website | Read Reviews (3)
Power Net Global's Avg. Monthly Cost: Inexpensive
Power Net Global's Average Rating: Outstanding - 5 of 5 Stars
3.Cox
Visit Website | Read Review  (1)
Cox's Avg. Monthly Cost: Expensive
Cox's Average Rating: Great - 4 of 5 Stars
CompanyAvg. Monthly CostServicesAvg. Rating
QwestVisit Website | Read Reviews (5)
Qwest's Avg. Monthly Cost: Expensive
Qwest's Average Rating: Great - 4 of 5 Stars
XOVisit Website | Read Reviews (9)
XO's Avg. Monthly Cost: Expensive
XO's Average Rating: Outstanding - 5 of 5 Stars
DSL ExtremeVisit Website | Read Reviews (9)
DSL Extreme's Avg. Monthly Cost: Average
DSL Extreme's Average Rating: Average - 3 of 5 Stars
TW TelecomVisit Website | Read Reviews (2)
TW Telecom's Avg. Monthly Cost: Expensive
TW Telecom's Average Rating: Great - 4 of 5 Stars
SprintVisit Website | Read Reviews (4)
Sprint's Avg. Monthly Cost: Inexpensive
Sprint's Average Rating: Outstanding - 5 of 5 Stars
CbeyondVisit Website | Read Reviews (12)
Cbeyond's Avg. Monthly Cost: Expensive
Cbeyond's Average Rating: Great - 4 of 5 Stars
Cbeyond Reviews

Recent Cbeyond Reviews

Cable Review - By: Quang Le

01/19/10

Pros:

Normal or nothing unusual. Price is equal or higher than our ex-carrier, XO Comm. (disclaimer - I don't work or get any compensation for XO. I was their ex-customer).

Cons:

It took them more than a year to finish our project of installing 2 T1. Starting 8/2008 and finished on 09/21/2009. Then, technical problem happened but no support because delaying paperwork. I filed BBB on 01/19/2010. Not keeping their promises.

Other Thoughts:

I had to keep XO Comm's service during that one-year-installation, and the technical support of XO was good and understanding - no grunting, no complaint. ATT send me to collection because they partially finished the project and wanted to collect the money for the T1 for data even I was guaranteed that the fee would be waive because they know that I had XO Comm service as a package of 2 T1's. Until 01/06/10, 6 months later, I still received collection letter threatening cutting their services.

Now technical is worse. Promised the project would be done in 45 days. it lasted more than a year with one shipment of wrong equipments. They don't come to your site for survey. They take info over phone and then blame back on us, luckily I told more than 2 guys about our configuration so they couldn't blame on me. Right after installation, we canNOT pick up any incoming calls most of the days, some days, if we are lucky, we can pick up 5 - 6 calls. I called and was transferred around for a total of more than 10 working days. Eventually, I was transferred to the right department IPFlex Maintenance and the tech support in Asia took half an hour to find out and inform me that they don't have our account in their system yet. This lasted more than 3 months.

Then, on 01/06/10, after 3 days calling around, I was transferred to IPFlex Maintenance again, this time they courteously transferred me to Mr. Jefferson III, Roosevelt at Provision Dept. who confirmed that our account was still within his department. He promised to resolve the technical problem in a day or less. He also took our phone vendor and promised to work with them. A week later, the technical problem was still there. I emailed him and the sales team on 01/15/2010 and got no response. Nothing - Nada. And we were still suffering with drop calls. I emailed them again today 01/19/2010 and got the following message:
" In regards to the CNAM issue, the one downside to using a CAS handoff is it does not support CNAM forwarding. The account is in maintenance so the provisioning engineers have no access to the router on-site. The phone vendor will have to call maintenance and coordinate remote support to troubleshoot the issue with the call routing issue. Once the call hits the router and the phone system rings the issue with call mapping is internal and a system issue involved with the configuration of the PBX."
I'm wondering where is the promise of fixing it the next day. where is their courtesy email etiquette. It was there with their provision department just 2 weeks ago and it had been there for 3 months. Why transfer our account now before fixing it? Why didn't let me know in my following up email? why they kept our account in their provision department for more than 3 months? More why questions like why they didn't live up to their promises? why they didn't care to give me the number of maintenance. Only until I asked and he slapped back with an email without greetings, ending. Very unprofessional : "At the time the account was not accepted into maintenance so it was updated in their database. The maintenance number to dial is 877 288 8362. "

Very Poor - 1 of 5 Stars
NoYes
Did you find this review helpful?
cbeyond cable reviews  |  cable reviews

DS3 Review - By: Carry Heart

11/15/09

Pros:

None listed.

Cons:

As with everything else AT&T - the service totally sucks and AT&T DS3 tech support is the worst on planet earth!

Very Poor - 1 of 5 Stars
NoYes
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Did you?
cbeyond ds3 reviews  |  ds3 reviews

DSL Review - By: Bob Steiner

10/23/09

Pros:

-They own most of the copper, most others are running on ATT's lines.
-ATT data center in Redwood City is very reliable and solid. Staff is AWESOME! Nothing fancy it just runs well.

Cons:

-quotes take forever & are pages of nonsense (hard to explain to clients)
-install dates are missed or misstated.
-technicians information is all across the board and never consistent with a previous call.
-tech support is horrible; like a grab bag.

Other Thoughts:

ATT has grown so large and as stated they own most of the lines. The mergers and acquisitions have been so horribly integrated (or haven't for that matter). After years of service as an IT Director I had multiple instances of other ATT reps calling me to claim stake on accounts and then resulting in reps fighting over accounts with the clients.

They have failed on some of the most basic areas of customer service and support. Tech support has a problem escalating support calls, etc...

Pricing is still very high.

Hopefully we get some relief from some company.

Average - 3 of 5 Stars
NoYes
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Did you?
cbeyond dsl reviews  |  dsl reviews

DSL Review - By: Christine

02/12/09

Pros:

it worked for a day or so

Cons:

just like everything else from big telecom it sucked, support., reliability, everything

Other Thoughts:

stay away!!! they could care less if they lose you as a customer and it shows!

Very Poor - 1 of 5 Stars
NoYes
4 out of 5 people found this review helpful. Did you?
cbeyond dsl reviews  |  dsl reviews